The first half of your comment mentioned the word should 5 times. This sounds like wishful thinking. Yes, there are some fundamental skill deficits and a lot

The first half of your comment mentioned the word should 5 times. This sounds like wishful thinking. Yes, there are some fundamental skill deficits and a lot of liars out there. The historical solution to this problem is to ignore it, use some tool to flatten the bell curve, and then hope for the best. If AI is just an evolution of things already tried, then we already know what the results will look like: less accountability, less credibility, less selection risks for candidate selection, and more expensive development processes. For example frameworks allowed substantially wider developer participation at lower product quality and high costs without change to business ambitions. We should expect developers to become more of a less capable commodity than they already were. Then when the technical debt becomes to expensive to maintain just call in consultants to tell everybody what is already commonly known.