2 ms·
It was probably downvoted because it is orthogonal to the issue. The website is (or should be) responsible for malware regardless of whether you are allowed to
by layer8 1y ago
It was probably downvoted because it is orthogonal to the issue. The website is (or should be) responsible for malware regardless of whether you are allowed to block it or not.
- close04 1y agoYes and no. Today the site should be held responsible. But if a law like this is passed then the site must be held responsible. This is what makes all the difference. P.S. Today a site owner is not responsible if an ad is malware, they pass it on to the ad network, who passes it on, and so on.
- layer8 1y agoI disagree. In absence of the law, the responsibility is just the same. It‘s unreasonable to place the responsibility on the user.