2 ms·
As someone that had open-hardware printers, they suck. They were fun to play with but not really ready for every day use. So perhaps a bad thing for the hardwa
by tiku 1y ago
As someone that had open-hardware printers, they suck. They were fun to play with but not really ready for every day use.
So perhaps a bad thing for the hardware side, but as a consumer/user I want a smooth experience.
- Symbiote 1y agoPrusa's printers have a reputation for being easy to use, but cost more than the Chinese competition. Your comment is ignorant nonsense.
- zevon 1y agoThat is hardly a function of the printers being Open Hardware. There are lots of unreliable commercial printers as well as fiddly open ones. However, the most reliable ones in the desktop space have mostly been open - like the old Ultimakers or the Prusa MK series.
- sublimefire 1y agoThis is very much a bad faith argument without any specifics. I found Prusa to be good enough. Do you have any examples of open hardware printers that were evaluated that did not meet the bar? Regardless the topic is about open hardware being squeezed using shady tactics. It means leas competition, less innovation. Rules to kick such players should be easy to enforce as opposed to required to pay quite a lot for such an action.