Picking at tangential points while avoiding the main argument hmm.... Admit it - you misunderstood my original point and accused me of then changing the argume

Picking at tangential points while avoiding the main argument hmm.... Admit it - you misunderstood my original point and accused me of then changing the argument. Bottom line - the original poster was implying there was no harm because simple copying doesn't create a loss. I was pointing out that a key test ( in considering copyright issues ) is whether such an action causing harm - and in this case there are many very good cases to be made about resulting loss of revenue. Let's be clear, I think LLMs etc are a huge technical advance - I just think it's wrong to try and ignore the law because it get's in the way of large companies attempts to make money.