> Dijkstra's point is that the debate about word definitions is irrelevant and a distraction. Agreed, and I've made this point a few times, so it's ironic we'r

> Dijkstra's point is that the debate about word definitions is irrelevant and a distraction. Agreed, and I've made this point a few times, so it's ironic we're going back and forth about this. > The second half of the sentence contradicts the first. I'm not saying the question is clear. I'm saying there's clearly an interpretation of it as a question about capabilities.