3 ms·
It made it sound like what they did is drop ship into a company, destroy all their existing procedures, and rush through a half assed piece of software to repla
by asveikau 1y ago
It made it sound like what they did is drop ship into a company, destroy all their existing procedures, and rush through a half assed piece of software to replace them.
It sounded a lot like the DOGE playbook. From that vantage point I became skeptical that they did anything good for their clients. It's like "douchebag outsourcing consultant as a service".
- Temporary_31337 1y agoFWIW, I am in a project like this where we a re given free will to use whatever it takes to deliver quickly and ignore the company internal procedures etc - we're using agile as it should be done (principles not just verbiage) so for example we don't have meetings unless needed etc. Needless to say we've shipped our first product a few months back and now it's v2 and now some of the team is moving on to other areas. Disruption can be good you know....
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- asveikau 1y agoProbably a case where you don't understand what it is you broke. Seen this too much to have any other sort of reaction. People come in without fully understanding what the existing solution does. They get overconfident that they can solve it better. They throw out the thing that is fulfilling the needs of many people. Their rewrite breaks a bunch of stuff they don't know about. But they also set the metrics for success so they've judged themselves to be successful. If the people affected by their breakage ever manage to get back in touch, the guy that broke them is already long gone.