> Wayland is an attempt to do one thing, and only one thing. You must bring in the other features (like window management and remote networking) as adjacent com

> Wayland is an attempt to do one thing, and only one thing. You must bring in the other features (like window management and remote networking) as adjacent components. It's fine to separate a small core protocol from extensions that flesh out the rest of the features. Wayland, however, did the small core and didn't bother to actually implement the rest, so 16 years on it still doesn't have feature parity. > "This Phillip's-head screwdriver can't cut cheese or open a wine bottle." Then stop handing me a screwdriver and telling me I should use it instead of my multitool.