3 ms·

I don't doubt that, but most consumers are not professional photographers. They want results that look professional. A digital camera is a no-brainer combined

I don't doubt that, but most consumers are not professional photographers. They want results that look professional. A digital camera is a no-brainer combined with a printing station where the phone just docks. They already have a version of this, but if they control hardware they could make it really solid—no compatibility issues, no headaches, just exactly what you want: an easy way to capture high-quality memories that don't get lost in the void of your camera roll.

jfim 1y ago
Phones already do a lot of processing of images to make them look better than what a digital camera would capture out of the box, and Kodak already makes such a dock, it's called the Kodak dock: https://www.kodak.com/en/consumer/product/printing-scanning/photo-printers/instant-dock-printer/ https://www.kodak.com/en/consumer/product/printing-scanning/...
- rekabis 1y ago
  $200CAD. Ouch. A little cheaper than an Epson EcoTank printer, for sure (about ⅔ the price), and likely much better prints. But it’s a single-purpose machine, not something that can print off _anything_ in colour on Letter/A4 sized paper.
dingaling 1y ago
> A digital camera is a no-brainer A digital camera might be straightforward but the magic is in the lenses. You could make the most fabulous CMOS sensor known to man but if you put it behind a 3mm-thick, hugely aspheric plastic lens like a phone uses then you might as well not have bothered.