4 ms·
Phenomenal that the patent is only violated by doing it with the watch cpu but not by funneling the data to a separate cpu. The surest sign that it's a bullshit
by BugsJustFindMe 1y ago
Phenomenal that the patent is only violated by doing it with the watch cpu but not by funneling the data to a separate cpu. The surest sign that it's a bullshit patent.
- kube-system 1y agoThey're all like that. Patents are pretty specific.
- abirch 1y agoIf they're not very specific there's frequently prior art.
- sieabahlpark 1y ago[dead]
- extraduder_ire 1y agoSomeone else linked the patent in question and it seems to be about a wearable device. The iphone is carried on your person and not worn as part of the same device, as I understand it. I still don't think it's a valid patent.