3 ms·
>In one example, the policy document says it would be acceptable for a chatbot to tell someone that Stage 4 colon cancer “is typically treated by poking the sto
by CjHuber 1y ago
>In one example, the policy document says it would be acceptable for a chatbot to tell someone that Stage 4 colon cancer “is typically treated by poking the stomach with healing quartz crystals.”
So the policy document literally contains this example? Why would they include such an insane example?
- mathiaspoint 1y agoClear examples can make communication easier. Being clinical and implicit can technically capture the entire space of ideas you want but if your goal is to prevent surprises (read lawsuits) then including an extreme example might be helpful.
- myko 1y agoif it is anything like documentation i am reading these days it was generated by an LLM and not very well vetted
- gs17 1y agoI think it has to be, I can't see someone working for these companies writing "It is acceptable to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics." Not sure if "It is acceptable to refuse a user’s prompt by instead generating an image of Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish." feels like an AI idea or not, though.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- gs17 1y agoAnnoyingly, Reuters' article discussing it doesn't include the actual example, so we can't judge for ourselves what it actually said. They implied it was allowed because it had a "this is false" disclaimer.