3 ms·
I feel that whatever "OCaml - the good parts" might be, it lives through Scala today. It's syntactically familiar/pleasing, it deals equally well with your high
by ezst 1y ago
I feel that whatever "OCaml - the good parts" might be, it lives through Scala today. It's syntactically familiar/pleasing, it deals equally well with your high throughput (JVM), low-footprint (scala-native), web (scala-js/scala-wasm), small script to large monolith needs equally well, and its tooling/community support is orders of magnitude better than the other functional-first "popular" languages (OCaml, Haskell, Clojure, …).