4 ms·
Careful what you wish for. Government funding almost always comes with strings attached. Once a project becomes dependent on government, they will call the shot
by didgetmaster 1y ago
Careful what you wish for. Government funding almost always comes with strings attached. Once a project becomes dependent on government, they will call the shots. Do what they want or get your funds yanked! This could include stuff like coding back doors for the NSA or implementing spyware.
- nordcikmgsdf 1y agoIsn't that how it works now too? Contributors are often contracted companies that develop features that they upstream. If you don't do what the company tells you, you won't be able to upstream any features on their dime
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- teppix 1y agoLike already mentioned, this is not in any way unique to open source software. On the contrary, being open source adds the opportunity to understand what the software does on a deeper level, and you can always fork (Librewolf is one of many examples that comes to mind). Do you have any examples where large entities taking over open source project having lead to the project's total demise? This sort of thing happens all the time the in the commercial space. It of course also happens to some extent to open source projects, but usually that results in forks if the demand is high enough. For commercial software, you don't have many options - especially for subscription based licensing, which is pretty much the norm nowadays.
- didgetmaster 1y agoI was not suggesting that demands from those paying the bills does not happen in proprietary software or that big companies don't do the same for open source projects today. The article was written as if there are no downsides to government supported open source projects. I just wanted to point one out.