3 ms·

So you're saying that if we want something we should vote for the opposite?

mindslight 1y ago
Well you certainly shouldn't vote for the con artist with a proven track record of blatantly lying. Especially when he keeps mentioning the subject, salivating at the prospect of having another turn at the trough.
const_cast 1y ago
No, they're saying you shouldn't vote for the proven insurrectionist and known con artist. You've been conned. I would feel bad, if this wasn't, like, con number 401.
- msgodel 1y ago
  If you don't like it campaign for meaningful opposition. Trump was elected after the Republicans were critiqued by the right.
  - cafard 1y ago
    I don't understand this comment.
kccoder 1y ago
No, start considering the source. If a mental patient tells you that a stock is a good investment, do you buy? No, so why listen to a man who lies with every word he speaks? If Kamala had been elected president the debt would've grown, but at a lower rate than under Trump, and her policies would've benefited regular folk, not just gazillionaires. Kamala also isn't in the Epstein files and doesn't have a history of sexual assault, and certainly wouldn't have moved that absolute demon Ghislaine Maxwell to a minimum security club fed because she was willing to provide testimony to deflect from Kamala's crimes (of which there are none). Shall I go on? You chose one of the most incompetent, nonsensical, unethical, greedy, lecherous humans on this planet, who also has an absolute lack of morals or empathy, because he said he'd reduce the deficit / debt? What did you think was going to happen? I hope you take this misstep as an opportunity for self reflection.
bovinejoni 1y ago
Had Kamala instead campaigned on curing cancer and making all Americans billionaires, you would have voted for her instead?
rsynnott 1y ago
Well, _previously_ ol' mini-hands ran on decreasing the deficit, and then massively increased it with tax cuts. In the words of another expert on increasing deficits, "Fool me once shame on you, fool me - You can't get fooled again".

Well you certainly shouldn't vote for the con artist with a proven track record of blatantly lying. Especially when he keeps mentioning the subject, salivating at the prospect of having another turn at the trough.

const_cast 1y ago

No, they're saying you shouldn't vote for the proven insurrectionist and known con artist. You've been conned. I would feel bad, if this wasn't, like, con number 401.

msgodel 1y ago
If you don't like it campaign for meaningful opposition. Trump was elected after the Republicans were critiqued by the right.
- cafard 1y ago
  I don't understand this comment.

kccoder 1y ago

No, start considering the source. If a mental patient tells you that a stock is a good investment, do you buy? No, so why listen to a man who lies with every word he speaks? If Kamala had been elected president the debt would've grown, but at a lower rate than under Trump, and her policies would've benefited regular folk, not just gazillionaires. Kamala also isn't in the Epstein files and doesn't have a history of sexual assault, and certainly wouldn't have moved that absolute demon Ghislaine Maxwell to a minimum security club fed because she was willing to provide testimony to deflect from Kamala's crimes (of which there are none). Shall I go on? You chose one of the most incompetent, nonsensical, unethical, greedy, lecherous humans on this planet, who also has an absolute lack of morals or empathy, because he said he'd reduce the deficit / debt? What did you think was going to happen? I hope you take this misstep as an opportunity for self reflection.

bovinejoni 1y ago

Had Kamala instead campaigned on curing cancer and making all Americans billionaires, you would have voted for her instead?

rsynnott 1y ago

Well, _previously_ ol' mini-hands ran on decreasing the deficit, and then massively increased it with tax cuts. In the words of another expert on increasing deficits, "Fool me once shame on you, fool me - You can't get fooled again".