4 ms·

Yeah turns out leeching off the surveillance state makes heaps of money. Great business model

by elliotto 1y ago

jesterson 1y ago
[flagged]
- dkiebd 1y ago
  [flagged]
  - jesterson 1y ago
    Spot on.
  - lantry 1y ago
    Don't be afraid to say what you believe! let's bring this out in the open. you're saying that women shouldn't be allowed to vote? I feel so sorry for you people. You need to find some constructive way to deal with your issues, instead of blaming your insecurities on women.
    - elliotto 1y ago
      I've made a lot of baiting internet comments in my time, but not in my wildest imagination did I expect a response to my comment mocking Palantir to be anti-women's suffrage.
- lantry 1y ago
  > shall I say mostly of particular gender You must be referring to the fact that 72% of our elected officials are male?
  - Delphiza 1y ago
    Upvoted. I would assume so, because male politicians like buying guns and stuff. They need data to know where to point them.
  - jesterson 1y ago
    [flagged]
    - lantry 1y ago
      Then maybe you should make your point openly, instead of this stupid dogwhistle. Are you saying women shouldn't be allowed to vote?
      - jesterson 1y ago
        > Are you saying women shouldn't be allowed to vote? The few comments you have left under this conversation serving it way better than all points I ever made (if I ever made the points to that, shall be added as a disclaimer). It's sort of funny you even fail to see that.
        lantry 1y ago
        Classic bad-faith troll response. You refuse to openly state your position, because you know deep down that it is despicable and indefensible. I am against the surveillance state, but I am not weak, gullible, or lazy enough to believe that it is somehow the result of women's suffrage. The two are not related, and your inability to untangle them shows that misogyny is more important to you than freedom.
        jesterson 1y ago
        Normally I wouldn't dignify that with a response, but just to put a final dot I'll share a few things. Speaking of openly stating a position - sapienti sat. Can't see how more open it can be, but it's certainly not of everyones capacity to have ability to comprehend a thought. Fully aware of that. For the rest of your comment - if you kind enough to pardon me for giving unsolicited advice - if I were you i would rather try not to manifest your insecurities but rather work on them, or at least do not show them in civilized discussions, which we all would like to have here on HN. And certainly would be great if we can keep your fantasies like misogyny and sorts out of the discussion. Dixi.

Yeah turns out leeching off the surveillance state makes heaps of money. Great business model

jesterson 1y ago

[flagged]

dkiebd 1y ago
[flagged]
- jesterson 1y ago
  Spot on.
- lantry 1y ago
  Don't be afraid to say what you believe! let's bring this out in the open. you're saying that women shouldn't be allowed to vote? I feel so sorry for you people. You need to find some constructive way to deal with your issues, instead of blaming your insecurities on women.
  - elliotto 1y ago
    I've made a lot of baiting internet comments in my time, but not in my wildest imagination did I expect a response to my comment mocking Palantir to be anti-women's suffrage.
lantry 1y ago
> shall I say mostly of particular gender You must be referring to the fact that 72% of our elected officials are male?
- Delphiza 1y ago
  Upvoted. I would assume so, because male politicians like buying guns and stuff. They need data to know where to point them.
- jesterson 1y ago
  [flagged]
  - lantry 1y ago
    Then maybe you should make your point openly, instead of this stupid dogwhistle. Are you saying women shouldn't be allowed to vote?
    - jesterson 1y ago
      > Are you saying women shouldn't be allowed to vote? The few comments you have left under this conversation serving it way better than all points I ever made (if I ever made the points to that, shall be added as a disclaimer). It's sort of funny you even fail to see that.
      - lantry 1y ago
        Classic bad-faith troll response. You refuse to openly state your position, because you know deep down that it is despicable and indefensible. I am against the surveillance state, but I am not weak, gullible, or lazy enough to believe that it is somehow the result of women's suffrage. The two are not related, and your inability to untangle them shows that misogyny is more important to you than freedom.
        jesterson 1y ago
        Normally I wouldn't dignify that with a response, but just to put a final dot I'll share a few things. Speaking of openly stating a position - sapienti sat. Can't see how more open it can be, but it's certainly not of everyones capacity to have ability to comprehend a thought. Fully aware of that. For the rest of your comment - if you kind enough to pardon me for giving unsolicited advice - if I were you i would rather try not to manifest your insecurities but rather work on them, or at least do not show them in civilized discussions, which we all would like to have here on HN. And certainly would be great if we can keep your fantasies like misogyny and sorts out of the discussion. Dixi.