3 ms·
I find it interesting that I'm being downvoted because I'm encouraging discussion and reasoned argument rather than just being all Rah rah! with one liners whos
by nobody9999 1y ago
I find it interesting that I'm being downvoted because I'm encouraging discussion and reasoned argument rather than just being all Rah rah! with one liners whose sentiment I endorse.
The point, at least in my mind, of HN isn't just to express one's support/solidarity with a particular point of view, whether that be with knee-jerk downvotes (did you even read what I wrote?) because I'd like to see more than shallow, one-line dismissals of anything, whether it supports or rejects[0][1] whatever thesis folks perceive is being presented.
I'd much rather see actual arguments on all sides, whether I find them reprehensible or not. We're mostly adults here, so we should be able to read and understand a variety of viewpoints, when we support them or even (especially) when we adamantly oppose them.
This makes for better discussions, better discourse and a better understanding of those with whom we agree as well as those with whom we disagree -- no matter how repugnant we may find the latter's viewpoints.
So feel free to vote me down because I didn't just take a vapid one liner as a good response. Check my posting history and you'll find that I think a Christian Ethno state is a bad idea -- for a whole host of reasons -- but I submitted TFA to spark real discussion and substantive arguments, not to pat myself on the back for being so smart and enlightened.
If substantive discussion isn't what you're here for, why are you here?
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44892682 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44892682
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44891739 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44891739
- jfengel 1y agoI think you're being downvoted because you're not sincere in the question. As you say, you already hold the position; you could make the argument yourself. The problem with devil's advocacy is that it can be a time-waster. One can play devil's advocate forever on any nontrivial issue. There is no point at which you have to concede the argument. If you suspect that the advocate isn't being sincere, many people will object to the potential time sink. Effectively, you've proposed a game, and nobody wants to play. The downvotes indicate that others wish to avoid the potential threadjack. To put it another way: they don't believe that it can be substantive discussion, at least not in this forum. There are reddit forums where you'll find people better qualified to present the position opposite yours.
- nobody9999 1y ago>I think you're being downvoted because you're not sincere in the question. As you say, you already hold the position; you could make the argument yourself. Except I am. And I did[0]. Asking others to do so as well isn't too much to ask is it? >There are reddit forums where you'll find people better qualified to present the position opposite yours. Are there? I wouldn't know. Nor am I interested to find out. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44895106 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44895106