4 ms·
This article is a random collection of claims without sources or even explanations how the author came to the conclusions. - NFS has the "pro" of being POSIX c
by looperhacks 1y ago
This article is a random collection of claims without sources or even explanations how the author came to the conclusions.
- NFS has the "pro" of being POSIX compliant, but I can't see how a FUSE device is different in this regard
- FUSE allegedly supports local caching and lazy loading, but why can't I cache or lazy load with a NFS share?
- NFS apparently has a high infrastructure costs - but FUSE comes for free? Then, the author compares cloud offerings, which should make the infrastructure concerns moot?
- the cost calculations don't even mention which provider is used (though you can guess which one) and seemingly doesn't include transfer costs
There's even more I can't be bothered to mention. Stay away from this post
- positisop 1y agoNFS is its own spec, that is somewhat compliant with POSIX, and arguably FUSE is POSIX and can be used to implement a POSIX-compliant filesystem.