3 ms·
>This sounds a bit like arguing that doctors shouldn't be liable for harming a patient. If you make a shady app you should be held responsible for losing your c
by logicchains 1y ago
>This sounds a bit like arguing that doctors shouldn't be liable for harming a patient. If you make a shady app you should be held responsible for losing your customers' money.
That's not what the issue is; the issue is that Play Store would ban _any_ app allowing coin self-custody, even if the app isn't any way shady.
- sapphicsnail 1y agoI'm not responding to the article I'm responding to this in the parent comment > If someone fucks up and downloads some shady wallet app that steals their coins, they're the one at fault. I don't agree with what google is doing. I think we should be able to download whatever we want on our phones. I think it's not a good take that the customer instead of the company, is the one that should be held responsible if a company fucks up.
- warkdarrior 1y agoHow do you reconcile these two choices? * we should be able to download whatever we want on our phones * not a good take that the customer [...] is one that should be held responsible