39 ms·
Yes, but it‘s not surprisingly high for a 1996 PC game. "You needed AT LEAST a fast 486, and preferably a pentium, to run this on the PC. Being upset that an 0
by doener 1y ago
Yes, but it‘s not surprisingly high for a 1996 PC game.
"You needed AT LEAST a fast 486, and preferably a pentium, to run this on the PC. Being upset that an 030 isn't supported is ridiculous. Reminds me of the people back in the 90s that complained that SimCity2000 didn‘t run smoothly on their 1200.“
https://old.reddit.com/r/amiga/comments/1mp1z3v/29_years_later_settlers_ii_finally_gets_amiga/n8guqw2/ https://old.reddit.com/r/amiga/comments/1mp1z3v/29_years_lat...
- snvzz 1y agoIt is an Amiga, thus it does not have to draw everything via CPU like the PC version. Expecting 030 to work is not at all unreasonable, and it's also a very common A1200 configuration these days.
- kookamamie 1y agoSure, but what defined Amigas were 7-8 MHz CPUs with a lot of dedicated chips for graphics, audio, etc.