A weights tensor is very similar to a truth table or a LUT in a FPGA, it's just a generalization of it with real numbers instead of booleans. And then again, w

A weights tensor is very similar to a truth table or a LUT in a FPGA, it's just a generalization of it with real numbers instead of booleans. And then again, would you say that you cannot build a (presumably extremely complex) machine that thinks? Do you think our brains are not complex biological machines? Where I agree is that LLMs are absolutely not the endgame. They are super-human litterary prodiges. That's it. Litterary specialists, like poets, writers, scenarists, transcriptors, and so on. We should not ask them anything else.