Agree with sibling comments, but I think it's a bad choice of comparison. I'm a Garmin Venu fan, but... apparently it was a $350 watch[0], and now there's a $4

Agree with sibling comments, but I think it's a bad choice of comparison. I'm a Garmin Venu fan, but... apparently it was a $350 watch[0], and now there's a $450 version[1] and an $800 version[2]. There's still an older one[3] available for $250 (or ~$185 on Amazon). Though I got my original Venu "refurbished" for under $100 (and it still had all the plastic wrap, etc. so was truly "like new.") 10-11 day battery when new (mine gets 6-7 days after several years of use, but I have never used always-on-display.) If I can get a Venu 2/2S/2S Plus/3/3S as a refurbished watch for ~$200-250, then I would go that route over an inexpensive Pebble 2 Time. Love that OLED screen. But I totally get the hacker ethos favoring the Pebble OS over Garmin. (Garmin does have a pretty good watch OS, and most things work without a subscription, which was a major factor in my purchase.) For $450 (or more...) it is not comparable to Pebble's offering. [0] https://www.techradar.com/reviews/garmin-venu https://www.techradar.com/reviews/garmin-venu [1] https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/873008/ https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/873008/ [2] https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/1510465/ https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/1510465/ [3] https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/801643/pn/010-02701-00/ https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/801643/pn/010-02701-00/