> and frame the public good not as rich internet, but as rich internet access Which is exactly why the $300 one timer almost seems to good to be true. I would

> and frame the public good not as rich internet, but as rich internet access Which is exactly why the $300 one timer almost seems to good to be true. I would almost be willing to actually participate in my local city council if it meant we could leverage the "free" package to enough neighborhoods for free wifi coverage. I really really want everyone to have uninhibited internet access, and I feel that free access to information should be amended into the bill of rights. Google seems to be the first company to actually be able to provide a solution for this, big brother worries aside.