3 ms·
There are more than two options. Actual paper cookbooks are good for that: no ads, no per-recipe backstory, and many other positive characteristics.
by drivers99 1y ago
There are more than two options. Actual paper cookbooks are good for that: no ads, no per-recipe backstory, and many other positive characteristics.
- danielbln 1y agoAlso no search (usually just an index and/or ToC), no dynamic changes ("I don't have this ingredient at home, can I substitute it?"), etc. Don't get me wrong, I love me a good cookbook, but being able to dynamically create a recipe based on what I have, how much time I have, my own skill level, that's really cool when it works.
- jen729w 1y agoI would have linked you to Eat Your Books, a website that lets you search the cook books that you own. But Cloudflare/they have inexplicably blocked me, some guy on his iPhone in a hotel in Vietnam. So, screw them, particularly on this thread about the open web.
- thrown-0825 1y agoMost of the cookbooks ive seen are just as bad when it comes to having too much exposition and not enough recipe.
- account42 1y agoAlso no search though and limited bookmarking and editing ability.