3 ms·
You're assuming bad intent where there are multiple other explanations. I call it the cookie banner and I don't run a web site at all (so, I'm not trying to tra
by bigstrat2003 1y ago
You're assuming bad intent where there are multiple other explanations. I call it the cookie banner and I don't run a web site at all (so, I'm not trying to track users as you claim).
- dotancohen 1y agoYou call it the cookie banner because you've been hearing it regularly referred to as the cookie banner. It was the regularization of calling it the cookie banner that confuses people into thinking the issue is about cookies, and not about tracking.
- bigstrat2003 1y agoSo, by your own admission, calling it the cookie banner is not only "a diversion tactic by those who are against the privacy assurances of the GPDR". My only point is that you were painting with an overly broad brush and saying someone is a bad actor if they call it the cookie banner, which is demonstrably not the case.
- dotancohen 1y agoI admit nothing, because I am not partaking into contentious argument. However I could have better phrased my original comment with the word "was" instead of "is".
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]