6 ms·
"it's counterculture if you ignore all the military/mass surveillance stuff" doesn't strike me as a strong defense
by Palomides 1y ago
"it's counterculture if you ignore all the military/mass surveillance stuff" doesn't strike me as a strong defense
- giantg2 1y agoIf that's your mindset, the internet must be similarly disappointing to you. In either domain, you can select where you want to go and what you want to do.
- monocasa 1y agoThe difference being that I don't think anyone in their right mind would declare the internet as a whole as counterculture in the first place anymore.
- overfeed 1y ago> In either domain, you can select where you want to go and what you want to do. In both cases, there was a time when both were exclusively people-powered and "the man" was entirely absent. "There are some authentic nuggets if you know where to go" are the last kicks of a fast-gentrifying neighborhood, to use mixed metaphors. In the past anywhere/everywhere you could go was authentic.
- zevon 1y agoI'm curious to lern when this phase of absence of the man and its entities - like publicly funded agencies and labs and suchlike - from the internet happened and how?
- wrs 1y agoThe Internet was originally funded by "the man" (DARPA) so this isn't entirely accurate.
- overfeed 1y agoDARPA funds all kinds of things without being involved / having a military or government presence in the thing - a contemporary example would be DARPA kick-starting self-driving vehicles. IMO, the web was authentically p2p before online Paypal, banner ads and Bonzi Buddy. It's still possible to subscribe to blogs (said nuggets) via RSS - which is miraculously having a renaissance - but it's all going to be drowned out by the relentless, unfeeling firehouse of AI slop.
- wrs 1y agoOK, but that seems like a funny definition of "military presence", since DARPA is the military. The goal DARPA was trying to accelerate by funding self-driving, btw, was to "achieve the fielding of unmanned, remotely controlled technology such that ... by 2015, one third of the operational ground combat vehicles are unmanned". [0] [0] https://www.grandchallenge.org/grandchallenge/docs/Grand_Challenge_2005_Report_to_Congress.pdf https://www.grandchallenge.org/grandchallenge/docs/Grand_Cha...
- overfeed 1y agoIt appears we e have different thresholds on what counts as "military presence". By way of explanation: rocketry was funded and developed for military ends, including von Braun's earlier work on the V2 and later work on missiles across the Atlantic and the development of ICBMs. IMO, there's no military presence in human spaceflight[1], but you may see it differently due to the heritage of the propulsion system.
- iwontberude 1y agoDark Tangent is/was a fed so it’s true of DEFCON too
- wkat4242 1y ago
- Palomides 1y agothe internet isn't a single centrally planned social context, and it has five plus billion users, of course it isn't counterculture
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]