3 ms·
It's simple - if they claim the loss in job numbers is due to AI, not economic downturn, that will cause more people to click on the article.
by torginus 1y ago
It's simple - if they claim the loss in job numbers is due to AI, not economic downturn, that will cause more people to click on the article.
- pixl97 1y agoI'd say it's a bit more complicated than that. Let's take the blame a bit farther back. Instead of the person writing the article, what about the companies laying people off. It looks much better to say "Costs savings for going to AI" versus "Economic uncertainty in future orders"