3 ms·
> this page is a great example of the UI ramifications of GDPR. No, this is an example of malicious compliance. There are so many bad GDPR banners because th
by wolrah 1y ago
> this page is a great example of the UI ramifications of GDPR.
No, this is an example of malicious compliance. There are so many bad GDPR banners because the people creating them want you to be annoyed by them. They want to have the easy path being the one that lets them collect as much data as they can and the most private path is as annoying as they believe they can get away with under the law. They want people complaining that the GDPR did nothing but cause all these annoying banners.
It'd be possible for many if not most web sites to not have such banners at all by simply defaulting to privacy-friendly behaviors, but there's too much money to be had in the behaviors the GDPR seeks to reduce.
- Findecanor 1y agoThere is a court ruling that German web sites have to make "Reject All" as simple as "Accept All". This site is not using a loop-hole. It is clearly in violation.
- wolrah 1y agoI honestly can't say I have ever in my life seen a GDPR banner where "Reject All" wasn't in some way more effort than "Accept All". The best I can think of at least keep it the same size and inline, but usually mess with the colors to make it less contrasting and thus harder to identify.