3 ms·

A new triangle: Accurate Comprehensive Satisfying In any particular context window, you are constrained by a balance of these factors.

• guerrilla 1y ago
  I'm not sure this works. Accuracy and comprehensiveness can be satisfying. Comprehensiveness can also be necessary for accuracy.
  • csours 1y ago
    They CAN work together. It's when you push farther on one -- within a certain size of context window -- that the other two shrink. If you can increase the size of the context window arbitrarily, then there is no limit.
• layer8 1y ago
  Not sure what you mean by “satisfying”. Maybe “agreeable”?
  • csours 1y ago
    Satisfying is the evaluation context of the user.
    • layer8 1y ago
      Many would be satisfied by an LLM that responds accurately and comprehensively, so I don’t understand that triangle. “Satisfying” is very subjective.
      • csours 1y ago
        And LLMs are pretty good at picking up that subjective context
        • layer8 1y ago
          How would they possibly do that on a first prompt? Furthermore, I don’t generally let LLMs know about my (dis)satisfaction level. This all doesn’t make sense to me.