3 ms·
While I know that WinRAR has some die-hard user bases, I have never been sure who their paying user base is. Are there some companies that are completely depend
by sidewndr46 1y ago
While I know that WinRAR has some die-hard user bases, I have never been sure who their paying user base is. Are there some companies that are completely dependent on WinRAR for some internal processes?
- RiverCrochet 1y agoI remember RAR being popular in the early 00's but when 7-zip started becoming a thing I switched to that, and then I rarely saw .RAR's. RAR seemed to handle large collections of files better on Windows than .zip back in the day, and it had a few features that .zip didn't, so it was something I typically installed on like Windows XP and such back then. But I'm not sure why anyone would use it over 7-zip today unless you have massive numbers of old .RAR files laying around. I did work for a company that actually licensed WinZip because it was easier to use than the default Windows interface for .zip files.
- radlad 1y ago> But I'm not sure why anyone would use it over 7-zip today unless you have massive numbers of old .RAR files laying around. Even then, 7-zip supports extracting rar.
- hulitu 1y ago> But I'm not sure why anyone would use it over 7-zip today 7zip UI is ... a bit special. It is not shitty like Windows {10,11}, but it needs some emotional attention.
- FirmwareBurner 1y ago> Are there some companies that are completely dependent on WinRAR for some internal processes? In aa world where 7zip exists, most likely not.
- AlexandrB 1y agoI'm one of their paying user base. To me WinRAR is like the VLC of archives. I can throw almost anything at it and it will work. Other compression tools, not so much. I'm also a fan of giving money to small, independent developers.