4 ms·
let’s be clear - you read a headline of a tweet that confirmed your biases and rushed in to post this? How do you know this is a 51% attack? Did you read any mo
by JohnMakin 1y ago
let’s be clear - you read a headline of a tweet that confirmed your biases and rushed in to post this? How do you know this is a 51% attack? Did you read any more than the title of this topic? who claimed this?
- bayindirh 1y ago[flagged]
- JohnMakin 1y agoThanks, but how is this at all relevant to what I posted?
- cycomanic 1y agoI don't have any beef in this game, but the previous posters message does not require that the 51% attack is confirmed. The claim seems plausible enough that people are debating if it actually happened or not, and if it is sustainable to keep it up. That's a big difference to 51% attacks being merely theoretical (which implies that they are unrealistic in practice).