4 ms·
It's not really the same company it was... just a name now.
by physicsguy 1y ago
It's not really the same company it was... just a name now.
- kotaKat 1y agoThere’s a bunch of Kodaks. * Eastman Kodak * Kodak Alaris * at least four separate Kodak licensees or more all also making photographic products among other plastic sludge: https://www.engadget.com/general/a-tale-of-four-kodaks-173040742.html https://www.engadget.com/general/a-tale-of-four-kodaks-17304...
- compsciphd 1y agokodak spun off Eastman Chemical decades ago (my dad owned some of their stock and held it to their bankruptcy). But looking at it, kodak shareholders were given 1 share of Eastman chemical for every 4 shares of Kodak they had. Eastman chemical has split once since then. Eastman chemical is now $60. Kodak ended 1993 (the new company was created jan 1 1994 I believe) at $56 a share. So that would imply that eastman chemical, that was viewed as 1/5th the value of the combined company in 1994 is now the value of the parent that was left over then (and no longer really exists).