2 ms·
As noted elsethread, there were no "legacy" (an abuse of that word) MS-DOS applications when the 80286 was designed. Intel wasn't really "doing an Apple". At
by JdeBP 1y ago
As noted elsethread, there were no "legacy" (an abuse of that word) MS-DOS applications when the 80286 was designed. Intel wasn't really "doing an Apple".
At the time most people were expecting 80286es to become a second higher-end market where people ran Xenix (or perhaps a new MP/M for the 80286), separate from a low-end 8086 market with whatever tinpot non-multiuser non-virtual-memory operating systems were going to come out for it.