4 ms·
Kind of funny after the authors of the law complained service providers were interpreting it overzealously. No, if Wikipedia falls under it anything meaningful
by mathiaspoint 1y ago
Kind of funny after the authors of the law complained service providers were interpreting it overzealously.
No, if Wikipedia falls under it anything meaningful does. You have once again failed to understand the internet.
- tzs 1y agoMany sites were overzealously interpreting it. The difficulty of compliance depends on both how big the size is and the kind of site it is. Many small site overlooked both of those factors.
- mathiaspoint 1y agoAgain if it has to be applied to Wikipedia there's nothing meaningful beyond a static informational site it wouldn't apply to.
- tzs 1y agoThe overzealous interpretations where not over whether or not it applied. They were over what the providers would have to do to comply. That depends greatly on the amount of traffic the site gets and the type of content that is on the site.
- foldr 1y agoWe don't yet know how OFCOM will categorize Wikipedia. This was a preemptive legal action.