The whole article seems to hinge on the idea that cursor is unsustainable and a large driver of revenue for AI companies. It seems to think that if cursor dies,

The whole article seems to hinge on the idea that cursor is unsustainable and a large driver of revenue for AI companies. It seems to think that if cursor dies, so does the revenue. I don't see that- cursor will die by losing market share, not by the death of the market. Agentic coding as a market will continue to grow and if Claude remains competitive then Anthropic will do just fine.