3 ms·

Your comment will get donvoted to invisibility anyways (or mayhaps even flagged), but I have to ask: what are you trying to accomplish with comments such this?

Your comment will get donvoted to invisibility anyways (or mayhaps even flagged), but I have to ask: what are you trying to accomplish with comments such this? Just shitting at it because it isnt as good as youd like yet? You want the best of tomorrow today, and will only be rambling about how its not good enough yesterday?

gjsman-1000 1y ago
Well, now I have to ask, what your purpose on calling him out, is. Does it deeply offend you that non-believers exist, who do not believe the technology will improve substantially in usefulness from here?
- senko 1y ago
  Neither of them said any of that tho. Maybe the GP is just celebrating the unfathomable and beautiful complexity of life? We just can't know - which is why parent is asking.
- unethical_ban 1y ago
  Different person here. Snark is rarely as clear or straightforward as an honest comment. You read several meanings from that comment, which I would consider speculation. It's just as likely they're just being clever.
- Philpax 1y ago
  Meaningless noise that contributes nothing to the conversation offends me. Being a non-believer is fine, but do us the favour of having something interesting to say.
fuzzer371 1y ago
Because it's never going to be good. People seem to have drank the kool aid that LLM's are the same as general AI and that its going to solve every single problem in the world. It's the same thing with the quantum computing and fusion reactor people.
probably_wrong 1y ago
While I wouldn't comment the way the OP comment did, I see the comment as a response to the hype of "the new version of the model is so good, you would be an idiot if you didn't start firing your PhDs right now". Hype breeds anti-hype, and comments like this are IMO the natural counterpart of users commenting on every single story with something AI related regardless of whether it's a good fit.

gjsman-1000 1y ago

Well, now I have to ask, what your purpose on calling him out, is. Does it deeply offend you that non-believers exist, who do not believe the technology will improve substantially in usefulness from here?

senko 1y ago
Neither of them said any of that tho. Maybe the GP is just celebrating the unfathomable and beautiful complexity of life? We just can't know - which is why parent is asking.
unethical_ban 1y ago
Different person here. Snark is rarely as clear or straightforward as an honest comment. You read several meanings from that comment, which I would consider speculation. It's just as likely they're just being clever.
Philpax 1y ago
Meaningless noise that contributes nothing to the conversation offends me. Being a non-believer is fine, but do us the favour of having something interesting to say.

fuzzer371 1y ago

Because it's never going to be good. People seem to have drank the kool aid that LLM's are the same as general AI and that its going to solve every single problem in the world. It's the same thing with the quantum computing and fusion reactor people.

probably_wrong 1y ago

While I wouldn't comment the way the OP comment did, I see the comment as a response to the hype of "the new version of the model is so good, you would be an idiot if you didn't start firing your PhDs right now". Hype breeds anti-hype, and comments like this are IMO the natural counterpart of users commenting on every single story with something AI related regardless of whether it's a good fit.