> I'm literally debating against a conspiracy theory. You’re debating against things people have directly experienced for themselves. You asked: > Isn’t it ju

> I'm literally debating against a conspiracy theory. You’re debating against things people have directly experienced for themselves. You asked: > Isn’t it just much simpler to accept that they indeed provide value in making good judgements? It is not simpler to accept that when you have seen with your own two eyes multiple cases where they definitely were not making good judgements.