4 ms·
Did you mean this is Web 3.0? (semantic web) Where the goal was to have a site's data as machine readable so that could be mashed up into something new? Instea
by 1659447091 1y ago
Did you mean this is Web 3.0? (semantic web)
Where the goal was to have a site's data as machine readable so that could be mashed up into something new? Instead of making it easier to gather the big sites locked the bulk of their data down so it never gained widespread adoption
Web 2.0 is what we mostly have now -- social, user generated content and interaction
- xp84 1y agoI think 3.0 as a term was taken over by those weird crypto guys with their alternative dns roots and suffixes, that literally no one uses. “Own your domain forever!!*” * Disclaimer: domain not usable for any purposes except on computers where you have root to install their alternative resolver
- wnevets 1y ago> I think 3.0 as a term was taken over by those weird crypto guys that is certainly what I think of when web 3 is mentioned.
- baobun 1y agoUnfortunately (?) there are no real semantics in MCP so it falls short of Semantic Web.
- 1659447091 1y agoYes, but not in intent. Semantic Web (which was web 3.0 before it got meshed into web3 apparently) was meant to open up internet data for new/novel applications and uses. The article appears to be alluding to that very thing via MCP. While it does fall short of the implementation of the Semantic Web, in a way it makes it a possibility to fulfill its intent without the full buy-in of site owners. There still has to be some buy-in or allowance, otherwise it will be locked down in the near future as some comments are expecting.