> Bad from a traditionalist software engineering perspective, but great from a business perspective (which is what matters). Not everything needs to scale after

> Bad from a traditionalist software engineering perspective, but great from a business perspective (which is what matters). Not everything needs to scale after all. Anyway, I do question whether the author has actually worked with LLM's a lot. I would think that the strengths failings of LLM's would get obvious rather quickly to anyone who uses them. Few things I've seen here. > If you're working in a field where "good enough" is fine, then I imagine that LLM's can do a lot for you. There's some specific timesheet software used for Gov Contractors that's hands-down, the worst web "application" I've ever used. Opening devTools on one of these pages is a riot--one of the "APIs" used return HTML documents with js file extensions so the browser fails to parse, every JS file is 1K lines long with blocks of global variables with various naming conventions, using 'back' in the browser just sort of fails and returns you to the sign-in page. Any modern web programmer would have a stroke looking at this thing. Apparently it's the standard software used for this purpose, relied on all over the industry. At a previous employer, I had to deal with some internal site for financial transactions and billing. Same story, ancient looking and performing web 'app' that had specific incantations to get it to actually work "don't refresh the page until that loads", piles of JS vomiting bizarre errors in the console, just a remarkable piece of junk. Anyway, short story long, there's LOADS of software that's terrible by any metric that have crucial purposes floating around that are far worse in terms of 'code quality' than any LLM would spit out. Also, I have more experience than I like to remember dealing with 'body shop' codebases. There is no way that an LLM is even capable of generating such low quality code. I legitimately think several of the projects I saw were sabotage; there's no way a human would deliberately write such inscrutable junk. Ever seen random python runtime errors cause the type of something would change depending on which branches were hit?