2 ms·

I think you're describing what was easily fixed in the past by better docs with examples.

• themafia 1y ago
  That and better libraries and continued improvements based upon feedback from usage in the field. Then open source very recently took a drastic turn and decided that reimplementing things in a new language was the best way forward, to move fast and break things, and to let the reference implementation _be_ the documentation. I believe these two facts are connected by the financial interests of the companies that promulgate them. It's easier to believe since their financial interests are so directly entangled. I feel bad for the author of this article. They're being led down a technological dead end. As always, the top reply to any of these posts, is a bunch of vague and hand wavy explanation as to why the OP is "doing it wrong" and how they're "getting actual value!" Never a link to the actual project or output. Probably because we could all search the produced code, find the prior examples, and once again point out that "AI" is just "copyright whitewashing." This industry is no longer driven by engineering but by gross financial tricks.