4 ms·
I agree, Google is definitely the champion of respecting your privacy. Will definitely not train their model on your data if you pay them. I mean you should def
by unnouinceput 1y ago
I agree, Google is definitely the champion of respecting your privacy. Will definitely not train their model on your data if you pay them. I mean you should definitely just film yourself and give them everything, access to your files, phone records, even bank accounts. Just make sure to pay them those measly $200 and absolutely they will not share that data with anybody.
- lern_too_spel 1y agoYou're thinking of Facebook. A lot of companies run on Gmail and Google Docs (easy to verify with `dig MX [bigco].com`), and they would not if Google shared that data with anybody.
- d1sxeyes 1y agoIt’s not really in either Meta or Google’s interests to share that data. What they do is to build super detailed profiles of you and what you’re likely to click on, so they can charge more money for ad impressions.
- lern_too_spel 1y agoMeta certainly shares the data internally. https://www.techradar.com/computing/cyber-security/facebooks-onavo-vpn-used-to-wiretap-competitor-data-court-filings-reveal https://www.techradar.com/computing/cyber-security/facebooks...
- grumbelbart2 1y agoLLMs add a new thread model. If trained on your data, they might very well leak some of its information in some future chat. Meta, Alphabet might not want that, but it is impossible to completely avoid with current architectures.
- Applejinx 1y agoHonestly, there are plenty of more profitable things to do with such information. I think ad impressions being the sole motivator for anybody, is sorta two decades ago.
- wat10000 1y agoBig companies can negotiate their own terms and enforce them with meaningful legal action.