4 ms·
It's a blog post about whether GPT 5 lived up to the hype and how it is being received, which is a totally legitimate thing to blog about. This is Gary Marcus's
by mortsnort 1y ago
It's a blog post about whether GPT 5 lived up to the hype and how it is being received, which is a totally legitimate thing to blog about. This is Gary Marcus's blog, not BBC coverage, of course it's slanted to the opinion he is trying to express.
- ninetyninenine 1y agoYeah which is exactly what the post you’re responding to is commenting on. It’s a classic HN comment asking for nuance and discrediting Gary. It’s about how Gary is always following classic mob mentality, so of course it’s not slanted at all and commenting about the accuracies of the post. So ironically you’re saying Gary’s shit is supposed to be that way and you’re criticizing the HN comment for that, but now I’m criticizing you for criticizing the comment because HN comments ARE supposed to be the opposite of Gary’s bullshit opinions. I expect to read better stuff on HN. Not this type of biased social media violence and character take downs.
- indigodaddy 1y agoYeah, but, he did "play with it for about an hour!"
- kelnos 1y agoSure, that's fine, but the question is whether or not that's interesting to the HN crowd. Apparently it is, as it made it to the front page. But I agree with GP's criticism of the article; if I wanted to know what reddit thought about GPT-5, I'd go to reddit. I don't need to read an article filled with gleeful vitriol. I gave up after a couple paragraphs.