4 ms·
Thanks for your reply! I hope this is the real reason of blocking. If that's not the case, that's at least not effective. Less effective than idk placing a bann
by s1110 1y ago
Thanks for your reply! I hope this is the real reason of blocking. If that's not the case, that's at least not effective. Less effective than idk placing a banner in the header or whatever.
I mean I eventually read the article. Sorry for that. But we're at "Hacker News", sporting hackers ethics, aren't we?
- inferiorhuman 1y agoOpposing the invasion of Ukraine and the biggest existential threat Europe's faced in a couple generations seems pretty ethical to me.
- pyuser583 1y agoWe should be jamming American media down Russias throats like we did during the Cold War.
- wood_spirit 1y agoRadio Free Europe and Radio Liberty were one of the very first things that the Trump presidency stopped.
- holoduke 1y ago[flagged]
- drysine 1y agoBy preventing some computer history enthusiast in Russia from reading an article on a processor from 1985? Really?
- inferiorhuman 1y ago[flagged]
- drysine 1y ago>It's not the author's responsibility to shield the Russian population from the consequences of war. "It's not the author's responsibility to shield the Russian population from himself blocking access to Russians"?
- inferiorhuman 1y ago[flagged]
- inferiorhuman 1y agoA quick look at your comment history reveals a relatively new account primarily used for shouting down comments that aren't explicitly pro-Russia. With that in mind I'd say it's safe to assume two things: 1.) You're not commenting in good faith 2.) The author's presumed actions were quite effective in spite of your disbelief.