5 ms·
So, I just looked it up, thinking I might have overlooked something but, at least according to wikipedia, REST does not prescribe the format of the data transfe
by prerok 1y ago
So, I just looked it up, thinking I might have overlooked something but, at least according to wikipedia, REST does not prescribe the format of the data transferred. So, I don't understand why you are comparing REST to xml, yaml, json or whatever.
Now, YAML has quite a few shortcomings compared to JSON (if you don't believe me, look at its handling of the string no, discussed on HN), so, at least to me, it's obvious why JSON won.
SOAP, don't get me started on that, it's worth less than XML, protobuf is more efficient but less portable, etc.
- layer8 1y agoJSON won because it’s what JavaScript in browsers understands natively. That’s also the reason why JSON even exists in the first place.
- prerok 1y agoAnd who decided that? Why not XML? That's backwards reasoning. XML was too complicated, so they decided on a simpler JSON.
- Groxx 1y agoXML has been supported in javascript for essentially just as long as JSON, arguably longer. Heck, the first in-practice and standardized HTTP request APIs for javascript were "XMLHTTPRequest" (and similar "XMLHTTP" names). And XHTML is a thing, and it predates both JSON and AJAX.