4 ms·
no, it's not because the nature of llms mean that even if you fully validate your communications with the llm statistically anything can happen, so any usage/th
by throwawaymaths 1y ago
no, it's not because the nature of llms mean that even if you fully validate your communications with the llm statistically anything can happen, so any usage/threat model must already take nasal demons into account.
- stouset 1y agoAdding new and innovative layers of unsafety on top doesn’t invalidate the need for safety in lower layers. If anything it makes it more critical.
- throwawaymaths 1y agoyou're missing the point. the point is, there is no need to make two layers out of one (i could be persuaded that it makes the coding easier)