4 ms·

I'm noticing significant differences already. Code seems to work on the first try more often for me too. Perhaps my favorite change so far is the difference o

I'm noticing significant differences already. Code seems to work on the first try more often for me too. Perhaps my favorite change so far is the difference of verbosity. Some of the responses I am receiving when asking trivial questions are now are merely a handful of sentences instead of a dissertation. However, dissertation mode comes back when appropriate, which is also nice. Edit: Slightly tangential, but I forgot to ask, do any of you all have access to the $200/month plan? If so, how does that model compare to GPT-5?

dyauspitr 1y ago
It’s the same model at the $200 price point.
- Tiberium 1y ago
  The $200 sub (ChatGPT Pro) offers GPT-5 Pro, which is not the same model.
  - anuramat 1y ago
    It's still GPT-5, just with the highest reasoning effort value
    - Tiberium 1y ago
      It's not, just like o3-pro is not the same as o3 with high reasoning.
      - anuramat 1y ago
        I guess it depends on your definitions, but they did say "the same underlying model" https://x.com/openai/status/1932530423911096508 https://x.com/openai/status/1932530423911096508
jostylr 1y ago
I have been using the $200 plan the past day in CodexCli and so far find that it is easy to work with (nothing crazy, just web app stuff). The context window means I no longer have to worry about running out of room and it seems to stay on track just fine so far. I have it incrementally coding pieces in a manageable chunk to understand and verify. No limits so far as promised. In contrast, using Claude Code ($100 level) I run into limits after just a couple of iterations of asking and context window gets problematic too quite quickly. It feels like 5 isn't gobbling up as much irrelevant text as Claude does.