4 ms·
As stated some place else: it's an open source project, so let's just have fun with names! :)
by julien_c 14y ago
As stated some place else: it's an open source project, so let's just have fun with names! :)
- loumf 14y agoYou have a right to name it what you want. If you have goals related to other people using, forking, improving, etc, then this name will make that harder. For example, in Showing to HN, you probably wanted some frank feedback. Your name is working against that as all you are getting is discussion of the name. If that's what you wanted -- well, mission accomplished.
- rhl 14y agoAs a meta-comment, the obvious should be pointed out: by creating shock value, the name creates discussions, which create upvotes, which drives more traffic to the post hence leads to more feedback. Call it "growth hacking" if you want, but the name is quite smart in that respect.
- loumf 14y agoI only see evidence of one kind of feedback, which, I hope, was expected, so it's not very useful. It's not growth hacking if you don't grow something you care about (e.g. users not "naming" discussions).
- mcguire 14y ago"Call it 'growth hacking' if you want, but the name is quite smart in that respect." Traffic != use, in roughly the same way that gawking at an accident != first aid.
- MartinCron 14y agoNaming is hard, and I appreciate the desire to have fun with a name. It's pretty clear from the responses that this particular joke doesn't work. Looking past the name, it looks like a well-constructed useful app and you should be proud of it.