This is dangerous talk, it's a huge writeup, and the word choice is used once, in a discussion about food. People will (mostly) give up meat only if the altern

This is dangerous talk, it's a huge writeup, and the word choice is used once, in a discussion about food. People will (mostly) give up meat only if the alternatives are yummyier, and have decided health benifits, which aint happening, so what will happen is that the guy in the article will play the roll of political foil as it becoms clear that he isn't suggesting that people could change there dietary practice, he's going after the whole agricultural practice for billions of people, to legislativly end the consumption of animal protien, and to do it he want people to donate money to him, instead of for things like health and education for children, something something "occupy the philanthropy space", some of the most deranged shit I have ever read.