> The bit about running the study multiple times also seems kinda random. Reproducibility? But knowing it comes from the CEO of Github, who has vested interest

> The bit about running the study multiple times also seems kinda random. Reproducibility? But knowing it comes from the CEO of Github, who has vested interests in that matter because AI is one of the things that will allow to maintain Github's position on the market (or increase revenue of their paid plans, once everyone is hooked on vibe coding etc.), anyone would anyway take it with a grain of salt. It's like studies funded by big pharma.