> But why records and classes when records can also have methods. Records have built in equality logic, Classes don't. And, because of the interop story, the

> But why records and classes when records can also have methods. Records have built in equality logic, Classes don't. And, because of the interop story, they wanted to be able to define classes. > C# reified generics and rust like monomorphised generics (with inline keyword) and they used to have two different syntaxes until recently I almost prefer the old way, where SRTPs required the other syntax. On the other hand I guess between 'inline' and constraints the compiler makes the 'best choice' now... Also, just minor pedantic comment, both C# and F# will monomorphize for struct of T