3 ms·
Kinda. Except in OCaml this deficiency does not exist: > Named arguments are allowed only for methods, not for let-bound functions, function values, or lambda
by mbac32768 1y ago
Kinda. Except in OCaml this deficiency does not exist:
> Named arguments are allowed only for methods, not for let-bound functions, function values, or lambda expressions.
- AdieuToLogic 1y ago> Kinda. Except in OCaml this deficiency does not exist: Named arguments are allowed only for methods, not for let-bound functions, function values, or lambda expressions. True. They are different languages after all, sharing a common ancestor in ML[0] yet diverging for their own reasons. Still, the original concern was identified thusly: >> I do not understand how they could develop a language inspired by OCaml but not bring over labeled function arguments. 0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_(programming_language) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_(programming_language)