3 ms·
Nice, but I want exactly the opposite. I want my agents to run locally without any sort of black box and I certainly don't want to be stuck with whatever UI you
by lta 1y ago
Nice, but I want exactly the opposite. I want my agents to run locally without any sort of black box and I certainly don't want to be stuck with whatever UI you've designed to interact with the git provider you've selected.
It's not a super surprising coming from this pole of over engineering so thick I'm surprised it wasn't developed by Microsoft in the 90s or 00s
- kristianp 1y agoYes, where's the open source agent that runs on the command line?
- ryuuseijin 1y agoIt's called opencode: https://opencode.ai/ https://opencode.ai/
- numpad0 1y agoTIL opencode-opencode name conflict was resolved by opencode keeping opencode name and opencode renaming to Crush 1: https://github.com/sst/opencode https://github.com/sst/opencode 2: https://github.com/opencode-ai/opencode https://github.com/opencode-ai/opencode 3: https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush https://github.com/charmbracelet/crush
- OJFord 1y agoAaah.. ok. And Charm Crush with the weird branding is the one that took/forked it creating the drama and maybe isn't trustworthy.
- johntash 1y agoAider and Goose are also open source. Goose is backed by a big company, but Aider isn't and was one of the first (that I know of at least). https://aider.chat/ https://aider.chat/ https://block.github.io/goose/ https://block.github.io/goose/